Archive for the ‘Website update’ Category

Acetate Discs

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

At Lost Sounds we receive many acetate discs from private collectors, as well as record companies, requesting the discs be restored and converted into a digital format. For most private collectors this is usually onto a CD and for our commercial clients the request is often to 24 bit/96 kHz.  But many readers and followers of this blog may have never seen or touched an acetate.

Acetate discs were cut as a pilot or reference disc for artists and production staff to gauge how the material would sound once transferred to disc, could the bass be held at the recorded level, did the stereo image transfer satisfactory, how does the material sound on a variety of decks and playback equipment. So an acetate was usually the very first cut of an artists material and may not even resemble the final versions that were then made commercially available.

Physically an “acetate” is far more rigid than a vinyl disc, it is manufactured with an aluminium core (the metal can be see on the edges and in the hole), which was then coated with nitrocellulose. Often they are 10″ (7″ singles were also cut onto this size disc) or 12 “, however we have also handled a few 7″ acetates.

Acetate

Acetate

The example shown in this picture is a 12″ acetate with only 2 tracks playing on the EMT deck . The material was a rare early 1960’s recording of Dave King and Glen Mason singing two songs together. As is often the case the B side was blank.

Acetate discs are less robust than vinyl, they were never designed for multiple plays, therefore many, today, carry high surface noise and because many have been used in a commercial environment they have not had a great deal of TLC! After a lot of work restoring this disc the material was transferred to CD for a private collector.

It is important to note that when wet cleaning an acetate do NOT use the method outlined below which is specifically for vinyl discs. Applying an alcohol based chemical to an acetate or indeed a shellac pressing could seriously damage the surface therefore great care should be taken. If your acetate discs need to be cleaned use a photographic wetting agent heavily diluted in de-ionised (distilled) water, if the disc is marked with finger and/or hand prints make sure the de-ionised water is warmed to just above body temperature this will dissolve the grease. Use a soft cloth, as for vinyl, and rinse thoroughly in plenty of  de-ionised water then leave the discs to dry for some hours before playing.

Flexible Records

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Many thanks to all those who have written to me saying how much you enjoy the blog and how interesting you find the information.

Not all that plays on a turntable is vinyl, acetate or shellac! The first picture below shows a promotional record made in 1961 pressed on card. These records, called flexible records, were quite common in the 1960s and 70s. The one shown here is a 3 minute recording about the model turned international fashion expert Francoise Garrigues. The recording was commissioned by the retail giant Peter Robinson and is in very good condition. It plays at 45 rpm, the groove can be seen through the picture of the model.

The recording was made by a company called Lyntone Recordings Ltd who specialised in these flexible records from 1960 through to the mid 80s. Early fans of the Beatles will remember the group’s special Christmas recordings made in 1963, 64 and 65 and only issued through their official fan club. These were also flexible records made especially for the fan club by Lyntone Recordings.

The second picture is a shot of the rear of the Peter Robinson record.The Store was based in Bristol and had just commissioned Francoise Garrigues as their Co-ordinator of Fashion.

Lyntone Recordings Disc

Lyntone Recordings Disc

Rear of Disc

Rear of Disc

Lyntone Disc on the Turntable

Lyntone Disc on the Turntable

Early Philips/Norelco Dictation Machine

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

For those interested in old magnetic tape recording formats, the photos below show a 1960s tape cartridge recently sent to us for restoration and transfer. The cartridge would have originally been used in the Philips/Norelco dictation machine shown in the third photo. This cartridge concept would have been attractive for office staff because it eliminated the need to lace the tape. At the end of side one the cartridge could easily be flipped over to record or replay the second track. This innovation was the forerunner to the Philips Compact Cassette introduced in the mid 1960s with dictation and speech recording in mind, however by the 1970s the humble Compact Cassette had been widely adopted for music recording which attracted further development; low noise tape, better frequency response, Dolby B and some very advanced decks to record and play the cassettes on.

We found this elderly cartridge played at 1 7/8ips and was recorded on both sides. Towards the end of the first side the recorded material speeded up quite considerably probably indicating a worn or slack belt on the take up spool of the original machine – we were able to correct this speed fluctuation and present our customers with a CD of their father speaking onto the tape in 1962.

Both the cartridge and original box were in good mechanical order as can be seen from the photos.

My thanks to David Morton who allowed me to use his photo of the Philips/Norelco machine (www.recording-history.org).

Philips/Norelco Dictation Cartridge

Philips/Norelco Dictation Cartridge

Philips/Norelco Dictation Cartridge Box

Philips/Norelco Dictation Cartridge Box

Philips-EL3581-00

Philips-EL3581-00

Clicks, Ticks and Audio Tape – Part 2

Monday, October 19th, 2009

When faced with any new audio restoration task our golden rule in Decca was, if possible, always use the original recording, second best would be a choice of “takes” which could be pieced together to give the best quality. We were fortunate in that much of the material we worked with was either from original matrix discs (stampers) kept at our record factory in New Malden or were from the dark end of our tape library known as the “graveyard”.  From the 78 rpm matrix discs new pressings were specially processed for us onto vinyl however despite this many of these matrix discs had deteriorated over the decades and presented their own problems that needed solving as mentioned earlier regarding the Vera Lynn pressing. Some material was no longer available to us because of the passage of time (I understand part of the New Malden complex was destroyed by a bomb during the second world war and much material lost) in these instances we approached private collectors, often the BBC record library and borrowed commercial shellac pressings. Of course when faced with shellac the material is prone to severe deterioration over time and this causes multiple clicks and crackle as was the case with the Boswell Sisters mentioned earlier. Shellac is a very brittle material and often rare records came to us damaged with pieces missing from the outer edges. These were great challenges because it meant creating a new intro. By editing in passages from elsewhere in the record we could re-create the introduction often unbeknown to the listeners.

The restoration of this material was very much a manual process in those days and therefore very time consuming. The thought of efficient and effective devices for removing these clicks, crackle and background noise were just dreams that would not materialise fully until the digital age, fast processors and effective algorithms.

Initial attempts at an electronic declicker gave birth to a device known as a switcher which relied on two identical mono signals (such as a mono record signal being fed to a stereo cartridge), the individual signals from the two walls of the groove were simultaneously fed to the switcher which was constantly hunting for the cleanest of the two signals to switch to. In reality only loud clicks were processed with any real success, the system was incapable of differentiating between wanted material and unwanted low level ticks. Later developments then saw a digital device available called Sample and Hold. This was a step on from the early attenuator device mentioned last week. It still introduced a drop out but at constant amplitude to the last wanted signal. The drawback here was unpleasant noises that resulted from this process such as low frequency thumps, ticks and even distortion in places. Following this a more sophisticated device was  introduced utilising a system called Linear Interpolation, which followed the same concept as Sample and Hold however this development allowed the process to match signal amplitudes before and after the click or tick.  Linear Interpolation has developed now to a point where the algorithm incorporates what is known as signal modelling. This process analyses the signal over a period of time learns the “model” of the wanted signal, removes the offending click or tick and replaces the unwanted noise with a shaped waveform that fits the model of the wanted signal. This latter tool is highly sophisticated and one that Cedar equipment and software executes perfectly. Recently I was working on a rare Jazz recording for a customer, when played straight from disc the recording was tarnished with multiple clicks and, more annoyingly plenty of ticks. I demonstrated the power of the Cedar algorithms to a visitor who happened to be in the studio at the time, by switching between the A and then the B signal (A pre processing and B post processing) my visitor was astounded by the resulting quality – more about Cedar next time.

Clicks, Ticks and Audio Tape – Part 1

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Removing clicks and ticks from recordings has come a long way in the last 20 years. Digital techniques, along with modern software and advanced algorithms, are a far cry from the manual process we used to suffer! As a young recording engineer in the 1970s part of my training involved working alongside one of Decca’s finest classical music recording engineers, Jack Law. Jack had recorded many of the best orchestras, operas and concerts and spent much of his time recording in Vienna. It was Jack who taught me the skilled art of tape editing while following the score, along with the practice he knew I was destined for – declicking! We used a Studer A10 tape machine for the training exercise and simulated the clicks by disconnecting the record amps and reconnecting them – worked a treat. Over the years I have edited out thousands of clicks and ticks from shellac and vinyl records. Readers may be interested to know that even some new material from the States was issued in Britain having been dubbed from discs. The early release of the Righteous Brothers “You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling” was issued this way because the tape hadn’t arrived from Decca in New York. I also remember dubbing a complete Chi-Lites album to tape for the same reason. Having copied a disc onto tape, this ancient method of declicking involved lining the tape up so that any click was precisely on the replay head, spooling by hand from left to right you could be spot on. A chinagraph line was then marked on the back of the tape, but only on the top half  (if the piece had to go back in you knew which was top and which was bottom). About 2-3 mm of tape was removed and the tape spliced back together. With the tape running at 15 ips (38.1cm per second) removing this small piece of tape amounted to approximately 8 milliseconds of recorded material – the size would vary depending on the intensity of the click, tick or thump. I always edited at 45 degrees and never vertically as this latter method could introduce further unwanted thumps. Most of the time the edit would work without any affect on the recorded material; however it did depend upon the type of material. I remember having great trouble with Gracie Fields singing Ava Maria – those long sustained notes don’t lend themselves to having clicks removed from them! On another occasion we were putting together a new album of the singing trio, the Boswell Sisters. The album was virtually complete and then Geoff, the Producer, was able to borrow a rare 78rpm shellac single with the group singing “I Found A Million Dollar Baby” (E 36826 recorded 25th May 1931) and “Sing A Little Jingle” (E36825 also recorded 25th May 1931). The disc was in very bad condition with clicks throughout. I removed about 400 clicks from each side which took me the best part of a week to complete. With the album finished it was issued in 1975 as Sweet Harmony – Hot Rhythm on the Decca Vocalion label (VLP 5). I kept all the clicks and still have them to this day.

A friend of Geoff’s, a musician and keen restorer of recorded music himself designed and built a devise which would clamp the tape down, and instead of editing out the click, this devise had a scraping mechanism. A needle point would scrape the oxide from off the plastic backing tape producing a small dropout. I never heard any of the results from using this procedure but Geoff Milne was very impressed with it. The concept is not unlike early electronic declickers which could detect a click and immediately mute the signal. What actually happened was the high energy of the click would initiate a very sharp fade out, mute and then a fade in. This fading/muting process would be only a few milliseconds and although it succeeded in making loud clicks less obtrusive, it failed to retain and restore the wanted signal. That was still some years away.

8 Track

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

As many have gathered, I am a great lover of old recording formats and have owned various tape recorders and record players since I was a small boy. One of these, quite underestimated I believe, is the 8 track stereo format. Originally designed in 1952 by American Bernard Cousino as a 4 track looped playback machine and running at 3¾ ips with 1/4  inch tape its great advantage was its ease of operation. Owners of reel to reel machines were hampered by having to thread each tape. The cartridge development eliminated this process allowing lay users to plug a cartridge into the slot and with an endless tape it could run and run. This idea was then developed by George Eash who refined Cousino’s design and produced a product in 1954 called the Fidelipac. First shown at the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) exhibition at the end of the 1950s its potential was soon noted and was embraced by many radio stations and used extensively for the playback of jingles and commercials. Standard speed on this machine was 7½ ips giving superior quality and the fact it has survived nearly 50 years in virtually every radio station in the world is testament to its design and ease of operation.

The first commercial 8 track cartridge was available in 1964, following extensive development of the original Cousino 4 track design. Changes focused on the mechanics inside the cartridge introducing a pinch wheel and eliminating tensioning devises. The aim was to mass produce an efficient, easy to use product that still utilised ¼ inch tape which could be pulled from the centre of the cartridge spool purely by the capstan and pinch wheel, pass the replay head and returned to the outer circumference of the reel. The playback machines had refined stereo heads fine enough to allow 8 tracks (4 stereo programmes) which would physically move up or down the tape height depending on which programme was being played.  Programme switching was initiated by a small piece of metal tape which made the joint in the tape loop. Initial commercial interest was aimed at the car industry, but later in the 1960s and 70s playback machines were made for the home. Cartridges were mass produced alongside Music-Cassettes throughout the 1970s and 80s only to diminish as the CD gained popularity but were a major contributor to in-car entertainment.

At Decca we had a purpose equipped room for producing 8 track master tapes. These were recorded on a 1 inch Scully tape machine before being sent to the New Malden factory for mass production. One major problem in producing these 1 inch master tapes was timing. LP’s and cassettes only had two sides, cartridges virtually had four. The headache was trying to arrange the artists’ material into four neat programme lengths that were all more or less equal. The only way we could mark the length of each programme was to stick a piece of splicing tape onto the appropriate point on the master tape – what fun. Those of you who have listened to an 8 track would have witnessed the occasional fade out and fade in where timing was impossible. One of my son’s has recently given me over twenty ancient cartridges, everything from the Rolling Stones to Saturday Night Fever. Playing them back in the studio here I’m amazed at the quality of the cartridge format and playing at 3¾ips they had an advantage over the cassette which ran at half the speed, the cartridge therefore giving less tape hiss, a better signal to noise ratio and a good frequency response.

Analogue v Digital

Friday, September 25th, 2009

For years now the debate has been raging over the difference in sound quality between a vinyl record and a CD – one analogue, the other digital (16 bit/44.1kHz). Many mastering engineers and record producers take the debate so seriously that even though they are working in the digital domain, they include, in the final mix down chain, an analogue tape machine running at either 15 ips or 30 ips to give their mix that magic analogue “warm sound”. French hip-hop artist Wax Tailor who’s latest release “In the Mood for Life” has addressed the problem by producing his material on a disc which is a CD on one side and vinyl the other so fans can have the best of both worlds! What amazes me these days is that I have spent years taking clicks and crackle out of worn records; I have a studio stacked with expensive equipment and software specifically for improving the sound quality of old records and then I hear a new release on the radio or TV, where the producer has added some artificial clicks and crackle to give the material that “vinyl sound” – strange world